Giá neversolNEVER

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has officially closed its investigation into the cryptocurrency exchange Gemini. The SEC informed Gemini’s litigation counsel on Monday that no enforcement action will be pursued against the company. Cameron Winklevoss shared this update on social media, noting that the decision comes nearly two years after the SEC began its investigation. Gemini was accused of offering unregistered securities through its “Earn” program alongside crypto lender Genesis Global Capital in January 2023. However, the agency clarified that the notice should not be interpreted as an exoneration. It also stated that this decision does not prevent future action based on the findings of the SEC’s investigation. Jack Baughman, Gemini’s legal counsel , also confirmed the news on X. He wrote, “Everything Cameron says is true, and more so. The SEC gov approached this investigation with a mission: shut down the crypto industry. There needs to be a complete rethink of how regulation is done, at both the federal and state level.” While the investigation’s closure is seen as a victory for Gemini, Cameron revealed the significant costs they faced during the legal process. According to him, Gemini’s legal bills amounted to tens of millions of dollars, with hundreds of millions in lost productivity and innovation. This, he argued, is just one example of the damage caused by the SEC’s aggressive stance toward the crypto industry. Related: Crypto Market Shaken by $245M Bitcoin Long Squeeze, Open Interest Declines “The SEC’s behavior has not only hurt us but the broader crypto ecosystem and the American economy,” Winklevoss wrote in a statement. “We’ll never know how many engineers or projects were lost due to the regulatory climate created by the SEC.” Gemini’s case is not isolated; the SEC has also closed investigations into other crypto platforms like OpenSea, Coinbase, Robinhood, and UniSwap. Related: Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulator Cracks Down on MKAN Coin for Illegal Operations Even with the investigation’s conclusion, the Winklevoss twins and other industry leaders have called for greater accountability within the SEC. the Winklevoss’ proposed several reforms, including the SEC paying back legal costs if it launches investigations without clear rules in place. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Bitcoin dropped by 30% rattling investors; however, historical data shows such corrections in a bull cycle are nothing unusual. CryptoQuant CEO and analyst Ki Young Ju reassures traders and explains that in 2021, BTC plunged by 53% before rebounding to an all-time high. This historical pattern highlights the volatility built into crypto markets while supporting Bitcoin’s long-term upward path. Mincing no words, he stated that panic selling at this stage is a sign of inexperience. “If you’re panic selling now, you’re probably a noob,” he wrote on X. With this statement, Ju meant to say that long-term investors with a strategic plan tend to do better than impulsive traders. He also stood by his February 19 prediction, calling $95K a key cost basis for institutional players. Crypto firms, ETFs, and mining companies have historically relied on price levels at $89K to gauge market direction. Notably, mining companies, with a cost basis of $57,000, are seen as a key indicator of market health. In the past, a drop below this level has signaled the start of bear markets, as seen in May 2022, March 2020, and November 2018. Related: Robert Kiyosaki Says Bitcoin is on Sale, Calls Price Drop a Buying Opportunity Yu pointed out that Bitcoin has never breached the $25K level held by old whales, reinforcing the notion that the asset remains in a bull cycle. His insights shed light on the varying levels of resilience and potential selling pressure within the Bitcoin ecosystem. Based on such diverse investment strategies and risk tolerances, the analyst remains optimistic amidst market fluctuations. He further stated that even a 30% dip from Bitcoin’s all-time high (e.g., $110K → $77K) wouldn’t signal the end of the bull market. In the midst of Bitcoin’s future discussion, former Binance CEO CZ recently offered a humorous, yet insightful, prediction about Bitcoin’s volatility. He joked about future headlines decrying a Bitcoin “crash” from $1,001,000 to $985,000″, suggesting that as Bitcoin’s market capitalization expands, its volatility will naturally decrease. Related: CZ Scoffs at Bitcoin “Crash” Talk as BTC Slides Under $90K While short-term volatility may lead to uncertainty, seasoned investors remain resilient, betting on Bitcoin’s historical stability and long-term potential. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

The latest stablecoin bill in the United States has stirred further controversy. While some say this is a calculated action to preserve economic stability, others view this strategy as more biased in favor of helping home financial firms. Co-founder of Framework Ventures, Vance Spencer, even stated that by preventing access for overseas stablecoin issuers to the US bond market, this restriction would undermine the global dominance of the US dollar. Still, is that exactly the case? I don't comment directly on regulation much but I would like to flag an emerging regulatory battle that is happening in D.C. The soon-to-be revealed stablecoin markup apparently has requirements to shut off access to the treasury market to centralized international stablecoin… — Vance Spencer (@pythianism) February 24, 2025 The measure demands the Treasury Department to investigate the possible risks of self-backed stablecoins and suggests a two-year ban on them. Simultaneously, the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is given more power to oversee stablecoin issuers, thereby maintaining the stability and control of the financial system, as we previously reported . This control on paper appears appropriate. Giving the OCC complete authority allows the government to make sure stablecoins never start to jeopardize the economy. Critics have responded, though, since this control is also seen to restrict access for foreign stablecoin issuers to the US bond market, therefore compromising global financial ecosystem flexibility. Particularly during the Trump presidency, the crypto sector is currently rather aggressive in enhancing its political impact. Although opinions on the policy have been divided, the White House and Congress’s dedication to enact rules pertaining to digital assets is seen as a significant industrial step. After all, the sector now fits into the larger financial ecosystem rather than being only a technology experiment. But with more stringent rules, one wonders: are political interests at hand, or is this truly for economic protection? Spencer thinks that this approach helps home finance groups striving to keep control over the market. Similarly worried was Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino. He claims that rivals try to replace Tether from the US stablecoin market by using political ties. Should this approach be followed, USDT—the most widely used stablecoin worldwide—may lose ground in the nation serving as the hub for global financial activities. Developing nations dependent on USDT for dollar-based transactions could potentially suffer as a result. Furthermore, limitations on foreign stablecoin issuers could delay down development in the digital finance industry. Some experts even warn that this approach would encourage innovation outside of the US, therefore undermining American hegemony in the industry. Is this regulation really meant to safeguard the US economy, or is it rather a barrier to steady coin expansion? The solution is yet unknown. One is certain that this approach will significantly affect the way stablecoins are controlled and utilized in the next few years. Furthermore, should the two-year restriction be maintained, it is not improbable that the market may seek substitutes outside the US.

Feb 27, 2025 $LTC is the most decentralized, fungible, longest running Crypto with 100% uptime, merge mined with $DOGE since 2014. To this day, @elonmusk has never posted about @litecoin I’ll post this everyday until he does.

Death Threats Forced Crypto Influencer to Flee Crypto influencer SolJakey has revealed that he fled the country after receiving death threats linked to allegations of insider trading concerning the controversial LIBRA token, launched by Argentine President Javier Milei. SolJakey, who had connections with Hayden Davis and his firm Kelsier Ventures—responsible for both the LIBRA and Melania Trump’s MELANIA crypto tokens—became a target of backlash after posting a defense of key opinion leaders (KOLs) and insider trading on 16 February. Some you guys are such cry babies, Arguing the fact that some people may have had insider information or had an edge on a trade because they are a kol or have a level of influence is a skill issue in majority. Large portions of the creators and KOL's you see being bashed for… — Jakey (@SolJakey) February 15, 2025 His remarks, along with a video where he humourously pretended to be an insider trader, were poorly received by the crypto community. This may be the single biggest clown take I’ve read to date You do realize that most serious people don’t trade on inside information right? Absolutely pathetic write up — TylerD 🧙♂️ (@Tyler_Did_It) February 16, 2025 insidor pov: pic.twitter.com/ISDfyV0HQD — Jakey (@SolJakey) February 16, 2025 The situation escalated when, on 18 February, SolJakey began receiving threatening messages from individuals who claimed to know his location. Fearing for his safety, he and his associates moved to an undisclosed, private location, reportedly three hours away, complete with a private pool and luxury amenities. The transition, documented in a montage with somber music, saw him addressing the situation from his new residence, where he discussed the LIBRA accusations, stating: “We came here because of death threats and squatting threats.” Despite the rumours and accusations, I was not involved with any of the launches of “Kelsier Ventures” I was advised by people around me to lay low, let the storm pass by abit, But I wanted to say my peace. Whether you decide to watch it or not, this is my story. SOLANA. pic.twitter.com/gVL14EIb7j — Jakey (@SolJakey) February 25, 2025 SolJakey Discovers Argentina’s Coin Project Before Launch Addressing the LIBRA accusations, he claims: “I had no part in the LIBRA launch, I traded it just like everybody else.” In addition, he denies being a part of the ENRON launch: “I’ve never received any token allocation, I’ve never received an early CA (crypto address), I’ve never sniped or insider traded in any capacity. My average entry on Libra was $2.5B. I broke even on the fucking coin.” So Frank Degods and Sol Jakey both get outed in the meteora founder phone call leak confirming they were insiders on the $libra launch. Interesting time for them both to dissapear from the timeline eh 😂 pic.twitter.com/jn1o7PcH5c — TheDefiApe (@TheDefiApe) February 20, 2025 SolJakey acknowledges that he suspected an "Argentina coin" would eventually launch, as Hayden Davis had informed him that he was advising Argentine President Javier Milei and had played a role in launching the MELANIA token. While SolJakey concedes there was an "edge" in knowing about the coin's potential launch, he insists he had no further details about the project. He said: “Wrong place wrong time, guilty by association.” His account aligns with claims from other crypto influencers, such as those from the LA Vape Cabal, who suggested that the concept of an Argentinian coin was already well-known within meme coin circles. SolJakey recounts several meetings with Hayden in locations like LA, Istanbul, and Barcelona, where he also met DefiTuna founder @CavemanDhirk, who later distanced himself from Kelsier Ventures. Despite these interactions, SolJakey maintains that none of these meetings had any direct connection to the LIBRA token.