Курс Echelon PrimePRIME

TODAY'S PRIME FOCUS: The future targets for⬇️ 🔮 $ENA | Ethena | @ethena_labs For information only—Not investment advice. DYOR❗️ Find out the anticipated target for $ENA in 2025 according to our analysts.👇

Due to the recent tariffs imposed by the U.S. government, central banks in Singapore and Japan are adjusting their strategies and policies to prepare for the economic impact. Ministers of the European Union are convening to discuss and present a unified response, while countries such as Taiwan, India , and Vietnam have stated that they are willing to negotiate to avoid the tariffs. Central banks in Japan and Singapore are also bracing for impact and are considering adjusting their policies and strategies. The Prime Minister of Japan, Shigeru Ishiba, announced his plans to negotiate with the U.S. to lower the tariffs on Japanese imports. However, he stated that achieving results with his methods will take time. BOJ officials, including Osaka branch manager Kazuhiro Masaki, who previously headed the BOJ’s division drafting monetary policy, have warned that the consequences of the tariffs are difficult to predict and could cause significant corporate and economic damage. Masaki added that companies in western Japan were already brainstorming ways to cope with downside risks. “This shock is unlike any other shock in the past in that it is policy-driven. It’s thus hard to examine the potential impact based on past experiences,” he said during a news conference. “The impact could come through many channels, including through trade and market moves.” The BOJ’s assessment of regional economies, which is based on surveys conducted by its nationwide branches on firms, did not fully incorporate the impact of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs announced last week, Reuters reports. The Asian share markets tanked on Monday following the announcement of the tariffs as investors feared that they could lead to higher prices, weaker demand, and lead the global economy into recession. The BOJ’s assessment of regional economies will be among the factors to be scrutinized at its next policy meeting between April 30 and May 1. Despite these economic issues, the BOJ remains cautiously optimistic . The bank cited that strong consumer spending, driven by the country’s rich tourism industry and luxury goods, would broaden wage increases and solidify capital expenditure plans. In Singapore, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is anticipated to ease its monetary policy further during its review on April 14, 2025. The consideration to ease the policy is due to growing concerns over the recently imposed U.S. tariffs and their effect on global trade. The MAS, which manages policy through the Singapore dollar nominal effective exchange rate (S$NEER), is expected by nine out of ten analysts to reduce the slope of the S$NEER’s trading band, according to a poll ran by Reuters. It eased its policy for the first time in nearly five years in January 2025. That policy decision was primarily driven by two factors — the country was experiencing a more rapid decline than was anticipated in core inflation, and there was also a projected downturn in economic growth. Singapore’s core inflation, which does not include accommodation and private transport costs, had an average of 1.8% in December 2024, its lowest level since November 2021. The low average caused the MAS to revise its 2025 core inflation prediction from an initial range of 1.5%–2.5% to 1%–2%. The MAS also projected a reduction of momentum in Singapore’s growth, forecasting GDP growth between 1% and 3% for 2025, down from an estimated 4.4% in 2024. Now, due to the U.S. trade policies, the policy might be eased some more. Analysts, including Lee Yen Nee from Fitch Solutions, have warned that the new U.S. tariffs could reduce Singapore’s growth by around 1%, increasing the risk of a global recession that could significantly impact the trade-dependent economy. “The latest tariff announcement by the U.S. raises the risk of a global recession, which would be very negative for the Singapore economy given how trade-dependent it is,” said Lee. Currently, Singapore’s GDP forecast is that it will grow between 1% and 3% in 2025. Now, Maybank has revised its GDP growth outlook to 2.1%, and HSBC expects easing due to weak inflation, which fell to 0.6% in February. RHB economist Barnabas Gan is an outlier among those polled by Reuters. He expects no immediate policy change. He believes that the policy will remain the same due to the resilient growth of the economy and the possibility of reduced tariff risks. He stated that it was worth noting that Singapore has the lowest U.S. tariff rate in Southeast Asia at 10%. He did mention that there could be an easing of the policy in the second half of the year. Cryptopolitan Academy: Coming Soon - A New Way to Earn Passive Income with DeFi in 2025. Learn More

The U.S. retail sector is reeling from the aftershocks of President Donald Trump's bold Liberation Day tariffs , but no brand has been hit harder than Nike. With a staggering 46% reciprocal tariff slapped on Vietnamese goods—a country that manufactures half of all Nike footwear—the iconic sportswear brand finds itself in a precarious position. Investors and consumers alike are now asking the same question: Can Nike survive this, or is it facing a financial reckoning that could spiral into bankruptcy? Nike’s deep reliance on Vietnam is no secret. According to the company’s own 2024 annual report , 50% of its footwear and 28% of its apparel production came from the Southeast Asian nation. Vietnam's strategic advantages—low labor costs, efficient shipping routes, and a skilled workforce—have made it a manufacturing darling for global brands. But that dependence has now turned into vulnerability. The newly imposed 46% tariff instantly inflates Nike’s production costs, destabilizing its entire supply chain overnight. Unlike competitors like Adidas, which relies on Vietnam for a smaller portion of its inventory (39% footwear and 18% apparel), Nike is disproportionately exposed to the fallout, making the blow far more severe. At 5:06 PM New York time on April 3, Nike’s shares nosedived 6.4% in extended trading, according to Bloomberg. The decline wasn’t an anomaly—it was the tipping point after weeks of selling pressure. Nike stock had already fallen 20% in March, largely due to weak earnings and growing competition from newer brands like Hoka and On, which are chipping away at Nike’s market share with innovation-focused strategies. This week's tariff announcement hit Nike at its weakest moment. The company’s Chief Financial Officer had already warned of continued revenue declines, and the market was listening. The reaction wasn’t isolated either—Shenzhou International, a major supplier to Nike, saw its stock plunge 18% in Hong Kong, its worst crash in over three years. The message from the market is clear: confidence is fading fast. While it’s premature to declare Nike on the brink of bankruptcy, the threat is no longer unthinkable. The company is now trapped in a financial bind. Higher tariffs mean ballooning costs that will likely be passed on to American consumers, just as the National Retail Federation warned. But raising prices risks further alienating a consumer base already exploring fresher, trendier alternatives. Nike may be forced to overhaul its supply chain, diversify manufacturing away from Vietnam, and cut costs aggressively. This could involve factory relocations, downsizing, or cancellation of expansion plans—all of which are expensive and time-consuming. The only thing more expensive than adapting, however, would be standing still. Trump’s tariff move seems less about Nike specifically and more about targeting Vietnam’s massive $123.5 billion trade surplus with the U.S. Once viewed as the ideal alternative to China, Vietnam is now being portrayed as the new "bad actor" in Trump’s protectionist agenda. In his 2019 remarks, Trump accused Vietnam of being “worse than China” in terms of trade exploitation—a narrative he appears determined to revive. Vietnam’s leadership scrambled for damage control, with Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh even humorously offering to “golf all day” with Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Despite easing taxes on U.S. goods and approving Starlink service as goodwill gestures, the country couldn’t avoid the crosshairs. The tariffs came anyway—and with them, a looming crisis for Vietnam’s economy and for brands that bet big on its factories. The rest of 2025 could make or break Nike. With its stock in freefall, revenues projected to drop, and costs skyrocketing, Nike will need to act fast. This could mean pivoting to domestic manufacturing, renegotiating supplier contracts, or absorbing short-term losses to preserve long-term brand equity. Still, there are wildcards. If Trump’s tariff enforcement stalls—as former U.S. Commerce Secretary predicts—or if trade negotiations resume, Nike may find breathing room. But hoping for political reversals isn’t a business strategy. Nike needs to restructure now or risk a prolonged period of market irrelevance —or worse, financial collapse. Nike isn’t going bankrupt tomorrow, but the storm is very real. The combination of weak earnings, intense new competition, and geopolitical exposure to Vietnam’s tariffs has turned a blue-chip stock into a risk asset overnight. If management fails to adapt swiftly, Nike could go from global icon to cautionary tale. In the end, this isn’t just about shoes. It’s about whether one of America’s most recognized brands can navigate the new world order of trade wars, tariffs, and consumer disruption. The next few quarters will tell us if Nike is still built to last—or if it’s running out of time. The U.S. retail sector is reeling from the aftershocks of President Donald Trump's bold Liberation Day tariffs , but no brand has been hit harder than Nike. With a staggering 46% reciprocal tariff slapped on Vietnamese goods—a country that manufactures half of all Nike footwear—the iconic sportswear brand finds itself in a precarious position. Investors and consumers alike are now asking the same question: Can Nike survive this, or is it facing a financial reckoning that could spiral into bankruptcy? Nike’s deep reliance on Vietnam is no secret. According to the company’s own 2024 annual report , 50% of its footwear and 28% of its apparel production came from the Southeast Asian nation. Vietnam's strategic advantages—low labor costs, efficient shipping routes, and a skilled workforce—have made it a manufacturing darling for global brands. But that dependence has now turned into vulnerability. The newly imposed 46% tariff instantly inflates Nike’s production costs, destabilizing its entire supply chain overnight. Unlike competitors like Adidas, which relies on Vietnam for a smaller portion of its inventory (39% footwear and 18% apparel), Nike is disproportionately exposed to the fallout, making the blow far more severe. At 5:06 PM New York time on April 3, Nike’s shares nosedived 6.4% in extended trading, according to Bloomberg. The decline wasn’t an anomaly—it was the tipping point after weeks of selling pressure. Nike stock had already fallen 20% in March, largely due to weak earnings and growing competition from newer brands like Hoka and On, which are chipping away at Nike’s market share with innovation-focused strategies. This week's tariff announcement hit Nike at its weakest moment. The company’s Chief Financial Officer had already warned of continued revenue declines, and the market was listening. The reaction wasn’t isolated either—Shenzhou International, a major supplier to Nike, saw its stock plunge 18% in Hong Kong, its worst crash in over three years. The message from the market is clear: confidence is fading fast. While it’s premature to declare Nike on the brink of bankruptcy, the threat is no longer unthinkable. The company is now trapped in a financial bind. Higher tariffs mean ballooning costs that will likely be passed on to American consumers, just as the National Retail Federation warned. But raising prices risks further alienating a consumer base already exploring fresher, trendier alternatives. Nike may be forced to overhaul its supply chain, diversify manufacturing away from Vietnam, and cut costs aggressively. This could involve factory relocations, downsizing, or cancellation of expansion plans—all of which are expensive and time-consuming. The only thing more expensive than adapting, however, would be standing still. Trump’s tariff move seems less about Nike specifically and more about targeting Vietnam’s massive $123.5 billion trade surplus with the U.S. Once viewed as the ideal alternative to China, Vietnam is now being portrayed as the new "bad actor" in Trump’s protectionist agenda. In his 2019 remarks, Trump accused Vietnam of being “worse than China” in terms of trade exploitation—a narrative he appears determined to revive. Vietnam’s leadership scrambled for damage control, with Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh even humorously offering to “golf all day” with Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Despite easing taxes on U.S. goods and approving Starlink service as goodwill gestures, the country couldn’t avoid the crosshairs. The tariffs came anyway—and with them, a looming crisis for Vietnam’s economy and for brands that bet big on its factories. The rest of 2025 could make or break Nike. With its stock in freefall, revenues projected to drop, and costs skyrocketing, Nike will need to act fast. This could mean pivoting to domestic manufacturing, renegotiating supplier contracts, or absorbing short-term losses to preserve long-term brand equity. Still, there are wildcards. If Trump’s tariff enforcement stalls—as former U.S. Commerce Secretary predicts—or if trade negotiations resume, Nike may find breathing room. But hoping for political reversals isn’t a business strategy. Nike needs to restructure now or risk a prolonged period of market irrelevance —or worse, financial collapse. Nike isn’t going bankrupt tomorrow, but the storm is very real. The combination of weak earnings, intense new competition, and geopolitical exposure to Vietnam’s tariffs has turned a blue-chip stock into a risk asset overnight. If management fails to adapt swiftly, Nike could go from global icon to cautionary tale. In the end, this isn’t just about shoes. It’s about whether one of America’s most recognized brands can navigate the new world order of trade wars, tariffs, and consumer disruption. The next few quarters will tell us if Nike is still built to last—or if it’s running out of time.

Ripple is urging the United Kingdom to expedite the establishment of clear and comprehensive cryptocurrency regulations with the aim of fully harnessing the nation’s fintech potential. The company argues the UK’s current pace hinders the digital asset sector and could cause it to lag behind faster-moving global financial centers. With long-awaited rules for crypto assets and stablecoins anticipated in the coming months, Ripple said that the UK is at its most important moment when it comes to the digital assets industry. While acknowledging the UK has the components to be a global digital asset leader – including strong financial services, foreign exchange, capital markets, and professional services sectors – Ripple points out that other jurisdictions are moving more rapidly. Neighboring jurisdictions like the European Union, as well as the more distant ones such as Singapore and Hong Kong, are advancing more rapidly with their crypto asset regulations, increasing pressure on the UK to act swiftly. It’s likely the reason Ripple is doing this is that it encountered reluctance from UK banks to engage with its services. In contrast, the firm had much better success in jurisdictions with well-defined regulations. At the beginning of this month, a coalition of six British digital economy trade bodies appealed to Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government to appoint a dedicated crypto envoy and develop a national blockchain strategy. They warned the UK risks falling behind the US, UAE, and Singapore without a unified approach. In addition, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is set to introduce stringent new regulations to align UK crypto businesses with traditional finance. These forthcoming rules will cover areas such as capital requirements, insider trading, market abuse, order handling, execution, custody, liquidity, and risk management. This is the FCA’s way of trying to make a safe, competitive, and sustainable crypto sector in the UK. The full implementation is expected by 2026. Will the UK lag too much behind by the time this sets in is yet to be seen, but its response (or lack thereof) will no doubt shape the future of its digital assets industry. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

$BTC has dropped below a crucial trendline and its 50-week EMA, signaling a confirmed shift into a bear market. The next significant support could be around $69,000—Bitcoin’s former all-time high and also the average entry point for #MichaelSaylor. Major blue-chip cryptocurrencies have fallen more than 15% in a day, creating what many see as a prime opportunity for long-term investors to buy in. Right now, it seems that only bold action from figures like Donald Trump or the Federal Reserve could reignite bullish momentum.