CreatorBid presyoBID

OpenAI has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, accusing the billionaire tech figure of attempting to sabotage the AI company through a pattern of disruption through what it calls a pattern of disruption – including an allegedly fraudulent acquisition proposal reportedly worth $97.375 billion. The suit, filed in a California district court, seeks financial damages and orders (injunctive relief) intended to stop Musk’s alleged interference, claiming Musk’s actions aimed to harm OpenAI while benefiting his rival firm, xAI. The legal filing claims Musk first tried to gain control of OpenAI after unsuccessfully pushing for it to shift from its original nonprofit structure to a for-profit model with himself installed as CEO and majority shareholder. OpenAI alleges that internal emails, presented as evidence , show Musk proposing to take complete ownership in return for funding – an offer OpenAI declined. The lawsuit goes on to assert that Musk later used public platforms and legal pressure to interfere with the company’s operations and partnerships. “Musk has tried every tool available to harm OpenAI,” the complaint states, citing press statements, legal claims, and social media posts shared on X . OpenAI claims his actions disrupted OpenAI’s relationships with current and potential investors, increasing operational burdens and raising employee concerns about possible instability. Related: OpenAI Now Worth $300 Billion After Massive $40B Funding Round OpenAI’s legal team argues that Musk’s $97.375 billion offer to buy the company was never genuine. According to the complaint, Musk provided no clear funding source behind the proposal, and the massive figure appeared disconnected from any standard business rationale. The company even suggests, without naming it, that the number referenced Musk’s preferred science fiction series. Related: Sam Altman’s $9.74B Twitter Offer To Elon Musk’s $97.4B OpenAI Bid The complaint further claims that Musk’s actions were “intentionally designed” to interfere with OpenAI’s business and limit its ability to compete in the AI sector. The filing suggests that Musk sought to secure an advantage for his company, xAI, by undermining OpenAI’s credibility and stability. This legal action by OpenAI comes after Musk sued the organization himself back in March. Musk’s suit alleged OpenAI violated what he claimed was a “Founding Agreement” by abandoning its non-profit mission and failing to make its technologies open source. OpenAI countered then that no such binding founding agreement existed in the way Musk described, and produced emails allegedly showing Musk was aware of and even supportive of the planned shift towards a for-profit structure. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Majority don't bid into fear because they are too busy listening to it.

Buyback blackout window Try to survive. Corporate bid waking up April ~24th

$SOL Would bid a demand re-test confluent with a monthly S/R level. Failing that, a reclaim of Range Low opens up the range and I'd be looking for longs into the mid.

There will always be winning times and losing times- try and mitigate the losing times. I do my best to outline what I see even if I do not like what I see or if it did not work out what I hoped for, Support and resistance is your friend, if you see one break or catch a bid then