Preço de Play TokenPLAY

What I would do right now, is create a watchlist of coins which fit the above criteria, and chart them. Instead of trying to randomly guess the next squeeze, play off key technical levels other traders are likely paying attention to.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hosted its first-ever crypto roundtable on Friday, pitting critics and proponents of digital assets in a sometimes-contentious debate focused on how to best determine whether or not a crypto asset is a security. President Donald Trump’s landslide victory in November set the stage for the country’s first crypto-friendly administration. One of Trump’s campaign promises was to fire then-SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, perhaps crypto’s most vocal detractor, but Gensler, seeing the writing on the wall, resigned in January and will now teach “financial technology” at MIT. (Former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler in an undated photo) Trump’s election and Gensler’s subsequent resignation sparked a shakeup at the SEC, with acting Chairman Mark T. Uyeda announcing a new crypto task force just a day after Gensler’s departure. One of the first notable activities carried out by the task force was establishing a series of roundtable discussions exploring some of crypto’s thorniest issues, and what better topic to kick things off than Friday’s “what makes a crypto asset a security?” Uyeda and SEC Commissioners Hester Peirce and Caroline Crenshaw delivered opening remarks before Troy Paredes, Founder of Paredes Strategies moderated a panel of eleven legal experts all opining on the intersection of crypto and securities regulation for nearly four hours. (Panelists at the first-ever SEC Crypto Roundtable / sec.gov) But even the opening remarks revealed a hidden tension between skeptics and advocates of crypto. While Uyeda and Peirce were generally more lighthearted and positive, Crenshaw, a Biden appointee, issued a warning. “Modifying the law to facilitate the success of a chosen product category is fraught with risk,” Crenshaw said. “We cannot poke holes in the foundation without expecting the walls may crack,” she added. The real fun started when an 18-year veteran of the SEC’s Enforcement Division and now president of John Reed Stark Consulting, John Reed Stark, took the gloves off. “The people buying crypto are not collectors. We all know that they’re investors, and the mission of the SEC is to protect investors,” Stark explained. “And how do I know they’re investors? Because whenever I go around and talk about this stuff…I get death threats afterwards because I’m talking about crypto and that it should be regulated,” he added. (John Reed Stark claims he has received death threats for advocating for crypto regulation / johnreedstark.com) Stark also said he read all the briefs from law firms that had legal battles with the SEC and each time, he concluded that the assets involved were all securities. Benjamin Schiffrin, director of securities policy at Better Markets, a non-profit that advocates for the financial industry, agreed with Stark. “I went yesterday to look at the websites of some large brokers…and on the web pages of a lot of them, there’s always a tab of products that they offer: stocks, bonds, mutual funds, ETFs, crypto,” Schiffrin explained. “I struggle with the idea that only four out of five are securities, and not all five.” Lee Reiners, lecturing fellow at Duke Financial Economic Center and Duke Law, completed the “anti-crypto trio.” Much like Stark and Schiffrin, Reiners echoed the general sentiment that almost all crypto, except for bitcoin and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), falls into the investment contract bucket. (The Howey Test is a legal test used to determine whether or not certain crypto assets are securities / Kyrian Alex on Medium) “In over hundreds of cases, judges have applied Howey’s three or four prongs…to the offering of digital asset transactions and found that in fact, there was a presence of an investment contract,” Reiners explained. Despite being outnumbered three to eight, the crypto critics appeared more vocal than their more open-minded counterparts, but the pro-crypto lawyers also managed to make some compelling points. Coy Garrison, partner at Steptoe One LLP and Rodrigo Seira, special counsel at Cooley LLP discussed so-called “regulatory humility,” meaning the SEC should not see itself as the be-all and end-all entity when it comes to regulating crypto. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the states, and even Congress all play key roles in regulating digital assets. Garrison praised the SEC for finally yielding to calls for clarity and guidance as evidenced by the release of the SEC’s Statement on Meme Coins and its Statement on Certain Proof-of-Work Mining Activities, both of which clarify assets and activities that don’t fall within SEC jurisdiction. “I applaud the work with the meme coin statement and the mining statement,” Garrison said. Collins Belton, managing partner at Brookwood P.C. reminded the panel about the second order effects of classifying digital assets as securities and urged attendees not to get too bogged down with the investment contract question. “There are so many other elements of industry that are affected by this downstream, taxonomical question that get lost in this discussion,” Belton cautioned. But Perhaps Teresa Goody Guillen, partner at BakerHostetler offered the most contrarian view of them all: What if the Howey Test isn’t the appropriate legal tool to determine the regulatory status of crypto assets? (Teresa Goody Guillen suggested that perhaps the Howey Test is not appropriate for crypto / bakerlaw.com) “Howey is the definition of an investment contract,” Guillen explained. “And if you think about these [distributed ledger technology] DLT networks, not as just some basic technology, but more as the fourth industrial revolution, as like a new business form, a new way of doing things, a new way of allocating resources, it becomes much bigger than that.” 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Bitcoin price is currently consolidating between $82,000 and $80,000, following its steep drop from an all-time high of over $100,000. This range represents a critical support area that traders and investors are closely watching for the next big move. If Bitcoin manages to maintain this consolidation phase, it could signal strong support at these levels, paving the way for another bull market and potentially new record highs. Historically, Bitcoin price cycles follow a familiar pattern: a sharp peak, a crash to a consolidation range, and eventually a recovery to higher highs during the next bull run. Consolidation is typically seen as a healthy pause in the market. It reflects that Bitcoin price is finding balance after extreme volatility. In this case, the range between $80K and $82K may act as a foundation for Bitcoin’s next upward phase. BTC/USD 4-hours chart - TradingView However, if Bitcoin price breaks below $80K, the market could see another drop, with key levels between $60K and $66K likely coming into play. Despite this potential downside, history suggests that Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory remains upward, with each cycle establishing higher lows and higher highs. ---> Click here to Trade Bitcoin easily with Bitget <--- Bitcoin has repeatedly shown similar behavior in past cycles: BTC/USD 1-month chart - TradingView This predictable pattern is part of what keeps traders optimistic even during pullbacks. Bitcoin’s ability to recover and set new records is what has made it a favorite among investors. For now, all eyes are on the $80K support. If Bitcoin price stays within this consolidation range, we might see the beginnings of a new bullish phase. However, a break below $80K could push prices down to $60K-$66K before the next cycle kicks off. BTC/USD 1-day chart - TradingView

Nvidia has triggered the “death cross”: this dramatic name for a simple crossing of moving averages could well signal the end of a historic rally. But while Wall Street worries, AI cryptos shrug (and sometimes raise their prices). A three-part dive into this strange ballet. A few days ago, Nvidia made AI crypto tokens plunge because, yes, we know: Nvidia is the king of AI, the boogeyman of the bears, the idol of tech addicts. So when its stock shows a “death cross”, this technical signal where the 50-day moving average drops below the 200-day moving average, analysts sound the alarm bells. On March 20, this grim crossing appeared after a surge of +948% since October 2022. Enough to make even the boldest tremble. But… does this signal in the stock world really impact AI cryptos? Spoiler: not so much. And this is where it gets interesting. Render (RENDER) and Bittensor (TAO), two well-known figures of the AI clan, rose by +4.06% and +2.88% respectively after the appearance of the “death cross” on Nvidia. Not bad for a sector supposed to tremble. One might think it’s a coincidence, but this isn’t the first time AI cryptos have taken a tangent. During the last “death cross” alert on Nvidia, the price had plunged by 47% in the following six months. And yet, today, the tokens seem to say: “Thank you, but no thanks.” This shows that crypto loves to dance out of step. This decoupling could well announce a new era. AI cryptos are starting to carve their own path, boosted by real use cases, an ever-vibrant Web3 hype, and ultra-connected communities. Their destiny may no longer be tied to Nvidia or the tech giants. Of course, caution is still in order – we aren’t going to play fortune tellers. But the autonomous energy of AI projects suggests that they might continue their rise… even if Wall Street is sulking. After all, in the crypto jungle, survival instinct sometimes outweighs a trader’s graph. So, Nvidia can do its funeral cross choreography, AI tokens may have decided to dance their own tango. Especially since 44% of experts bet on a forthcoming surge of these tokens ! What if we were entering an era where AI crypto would no longer follow the NASDAQ masters? To be continued… closely.

Still not convinced until USDT.D makes another LL and preferably closing below 4.76% There is still that inverted 3 drive pattern in play and all these LL/LH could mislead many traders. Treat all new trades as scalps, either side.