Prezzo di cVault.financeCORE

Robert Kiyosaki, author of the best-selling book Rich Dad Poor Dad, has cautioned against a common mindset he believes keeps many people financially stuck. His book has been a long-standing bestseller, translated into dozens of languages and read by millions worldwide seeking a path to financial freedom. Kiyosaki shared on social media platform X on March 23: “The main reason poor people remain poor is due to FOMM: Fear of Making Mistakes. The biggest opportunity in history is here. Bitcoin has made it easy for everyone to become rich. Yet most people with FOMM will miss one of the greatest wealth creations in history.” The acclaimed author believes that FOMM (Fear of Making Mistakes) is a deeper psychological barrier than FOMO (Fear of Missing Out). According to Kiyosaki, FOMM is what stops intelligent, often highly educated individuals from taking financial action, especially when it comes to investing in emerging opportunities like bitcoin. He continued: If history is any indicator, the FOMO crowd investing in bitcoin will accelerate into generational wealth … the FOMM crowd will wait till bitcoin passed $200K this year and say: ‘bitcoin is too expensive.’ The renowned author emphasized that the window of opportunity with bitcoin is still open but closing fast. He urged his followers to educate themselves by listening to voices from both sides of the bitcoin debate. “Don’t take my word for it. Listen to the people I follow and learn them,” he advised, noting that people he follows include Jeff Booth, Michael Saylor, Samson Mow, Max Keiser, Donald Trump, George of Cryptos R Us, Mark Moss, Larry Lepard, Kathy Wood, Raoul Pal, and Anthony Scaramucci. “Then listen to those who trash bitcoin,” he further shared, adding: Once you learn from those who love bitcoin and those who hate bitcoin, then you decide. Kiyosaki, a long-time advocate of bitcoin, sees it as a revolutionary financial tool and a hedge against fiat currencies. He’s frequently warned of the declining U.S. dollar, the fragility of the economy, and the outdated lessons taught in schools. His core message remains consistent: embrace financial education, overcome the fear of making mistakes, and seize opportunities like bitcoin before it’s too late. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

In a stunning revelation that adds political intrigue to an already high-profile legal battle, Reuters has uncovered that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) interim chief, Mark Uyeda, cast the sole dissenting vote against suing Elon Musk earlier this year. The closed-door vote, held just days before Republicans took control of the agency in January, approved a lawsuit over Musk’s delayed disclosure of Twitter stock purchases. The 4-1 decision not only highlights deep internal divisions within the SEC but also raises serious questions about political pressure, regulatory integrity, and the future of enforcement under a Musk-friendly administration. In a quiet but consequential January vote, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decided 4-1 to sue Elon Musk over his delayed disclosure of Twitter shares. The vote, revealed exclusively by Reuters , exposed a deep rift within the agency. The lone dissenter? Republican Commissioner Mark Uyeda, now the SEC’s interim chief. His "no" vote came just days before a political shift in Washington saw Republicans take control of the agency. The core issue stems from Musk’s 2022 acquisition of Twitter (now X), when he disclosed his stake 21 days late—far beyond the required 10-day window for holdings exceeding 5%. That delay, the SEC argues, allowed him to scoop up more shares at lower prices, saving him $150 million and triggering market movements. The agency sued Musk on January 14, just a week after the commissioners' internal vote. Uyeda, a Republican appointee and close observer of political implications, reportedly questioned the motives behind the lawsuit. Before the vote, he asked SEC enforcement staff to sign pledges that the case was free from political influence—an unusual move rejected by the staff. His opposition was not necessarily about Musk’s actions, but about the optics and timing of the enforcement, which came just before a change in administration. The timing has raised eyebrows. Musk is a known ally of President Donald Trump, and the vote occurred just before Republican leadership took over the SEC. Trump has since issued an executive order accusing the SEC of partisan targeting under Biden and demanded a review of politically driven investigations. Though the SEC declined to comment, the lawsuit’s proximity to the power shift casts doubt on the agency’s neutrality in the eyes of critics. The commission reportedly demanded Musk give up the $150 million in alleged gains and pay an additional penalty. While Uyeda voted no, fellow Republican Hester Peirce sided with the three Democratic commissioners, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The decision shows an unusual split within Republican ranks and underscores the internal friction over how to deal with the billionaire entrepreneur. Intent was key. SEC investigators explored whether Musk knowingly delayed the filing—a charge that could carry more severe consequences. Musk, however, claimed he misunderstood the rule and eventually complied. The SEC dropped the intent angle but still pursued civil penalties. Musk had agreed to be deposed twice but resisted further interviews, delaying the case until after the 2024 election. Legal experts question the SEC’s sluggish pace. A late filing case is typically straightforward. "Bringing it at the last minute—it loses credibility," said Howard Fischer, a former SEC lawyer. Others argue that not filing at all would have looked like selective enforcement, undermining the agency’s role in upholding fair markets. Musk has until April 4 to respond to the court summons. With Uyeda now leading the SEC and Trump ordering a review of the agency’s actions, the Musk case could become a lightning rod in the wider war over regulatory power and political influence. Musk’s long-standing feud with the SEC—dating back to his 2018 Tesla tweet saga—adds more fuel to the fire. The internal divide within the SEC, revealed in this exclusive report, paints a picture of an agency caught between law and politics. Whether the case against Musk is about justice or timing remains an open question—one that could reshape the future of securities enforcement in a deeply divided America.

What is the SOIL Project? A Simple Explanation for First-Time Listeners. We’re talking about the new trend in the crypto world – “Real World Assets (#RWA)” or projects backed by real-world assets. SOIL is a DeFi (Decentralized Finance) protocol that operates in this space. So, what does it do? #SOIL’s Main Goal: Unlike traditional crypto projects, SOIL brings real-world assets like real estate and bonds to the blockchain. This means that your tokens are backed by tangible value, providing both stability and security. 🗞️ Let’s Learn More About SOIL with Recent Developments: 1️⃣ Big Event in Warsaw! On March 26, at an event supported by Poland’s largest bank, PKO Bank, the SOIL team will discuss the “DeFi + RWA” vision. Traditional finance and the crypto world coming together! 2️⃣ What Happened in New York? The SOIL team met with major players like Ripple (the team behind XRP), Wormhole (cross-chain transfer experts), and Securitize (tokenization giant). They also attended the Digital Asset Summit (Trump was even there! 😊). Key news like SEC’s withdrawal from the XRP case and Australia’s crypto regulation plans are crucial for SOIL’s future. 3️⃣ Strategic Partnership with Chainlink SOIL is collaborating with #Chainlink ($LINK) to simplify cross-chain token transfers. Additionally, Chainlink’s reliable data sources will integrate RWA’s into the blockchain. So, it’s both fast and secure! 💡 Why is SOIL Important? Real Assets = Risk Reduction: A token backed by physical assets can be more stable against crypto’s volatility. Bank Partnerships: Collaborating with a giant like PKO Bank shows that traditional finance is warming up to crypto. Regulation Compliance: Countries like Australia are introducing crypto regulations that align with SOIL’s RWA model, which could further strengthen the project. SOIL: A DeFi protocol that bridges blockchain with the “real world,” partnering with banks and big projects. If the RWA trend grows, SOIL could be in the spotlight. It’s worth keeping an eye on! If you’re new to this, don’t worry! The core idea behind SOIL is the combination of “Crypto + Real Assets.” What more do you need? 😊 @soil_farm @chainlink #RWA #USDC

Week will be insane. Thursday 27th: -US GDP (Q4) (est. 2.3%, Prev. Two readings. 3.1%, 3.0%) -US Jobless Claims (est. 225k, Prev. Two readings. 223k, 221k) -Paul Atkins’s Confirmation hearing to lead the US SEC Friday 28th: -US Core PCE Y/Y EST. 2.7% vs 2.6% Prev. -US Core

The trend of institutional investors embracing Bitcoin continues to gain momentum, with the “HODL Top 70” list of companies now collectively holding a staggering 670,153 BTC. This increasing accumulation of Bitcoin by corporate entities reflects a growing confidence in the cryptocurrency’s long-term value proposition. In the past week alone, five companies further expanded their digital asset portfolios, adding a total of 7,349 BTC to their already substantial reserves. Which Companies Are Leading the Charge in Bitcoin Accumulation? When it comes to individual corporate Bitcoin holdings, Strategy (MSTR) remains the undisputed leader , currently possessing an impressive 506,137 BTC. The company’s well-known and aggressive Bitcoin accumulation strategy keeps it significantly ahead of all other publicly traded firms in this space. Following Strategy is Marathon Digital (MARA) with a substantial 46,374 BTC, maintaining its position as a key player in the Bitcoin mining industry. Riot Platforms (RIOT) holds 18,692 BTC, further demonstrating its strong commitment to Bitcoin as a core asset in its treasury. Related: Strategy (Formerly MicroStrategy) Launches $2.1 Billion Share Sale to Fund Further Bitcoin Acquisitions Tesla (TSLA) continues to hold a significant amount of Bitcoin, retaining 11,509 BTC, which reflects its sustained investment in the cryptocurrency despite the market’s inherent volatility. Cleanspark (CLSK) has accumulated 11,177 BTC, further solidifying its position within the Bitcoin mining sector. Hut 8 (HUT) closely follows with 10,237 BTC, remaining one of the industry’s leading Bitcoin mining companies. Coinbase (COIN), a major cryptocurrency exchange, holds 9,480 BTC, ensuring it has significant exposure to Bitcoin’s price fluctuations. Block (formerly known as Square) owns a notable 8,485 BTC, underscoring its long-term belief in Bitcoin’s potential as a transformative technology and asset. Galaxy Digital (GLXY), a prominent investment firm focused on digital assets, holds 4,848 BTC, showcasing its commitment to Bitcoin as a key component of the evolving financial landscape. Bitcoin Group SE (BTGGF), a European institutional investor, has accumulated 3,605 BTC, further strengthening its presence in the Bitcoin market. Metaplanet recently increased its holdings, now reaching a total of 3,350 BTC. This strategic move aligns with the company’s publicly stated bullish outlook on Bitcoin’s future. Semler Scientific (SMLR) holds 3,192 BTC, maintaining a significant corporate stake in the cryptocurrency. Hive Digital (HIVE) possesses 2,620 BTC, supporting its operations in the digital asset mining space. Cango (CANG) has also increased its exposure to Bitcoin, now holding 1,944 BTC. Exodus (EXOD) follows with 1,900 BTC, using Bitcoin as part of its reserves to support its digital wallet services. BitFuFu (FUFU) owns 1,800 BTC, reflecting the broader trend of increasing institutional adoption of Bitcoin. Nexon (NEXOF) holds 1,717 BTC, demonstrating continued corporate confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term value as an asset. Related: Bitcoin Bet Pays Off: Strategy₿ (MSTR) Outperforms Top Stocks Fold (FLD) has accumulated 1,485 BTC, highlighting its ongoing commitment to the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Canaan (CAN), a major manufacturer of Bitcoin mining hardware, holds 1,355 BTC, maintaining its presence within the Bitcoin industry. This sustained and growing institutional adoption signals a strong and enduring corporate belief in Bitcoin’s potential as a valuable long-term investment asset. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.