ZeroLend priceZERO

There are weeks when everything seems to smile on the market. And then there are those when the numbers fall like dead leaves, silently but gravely. Bitcoin ETFs, these open windows to the crypto universe for traditional investors, have experienced one of those weeks where enthusiasm has strayed. Three days were enough to sweep away momentum, pull back capital, and instill doubt. And as often happens, everything begins with a beautiful promise… The recent stabilization of flows in Bitcoin ETFs, long awaited as a sign of market maturity, may ultimately disappoint. The hoped-for calm has turned into a sharp decline, shattering the illusions of bullish continuity. Where analysts saw a decisive turning point, the numbers tell a more unstable, even disorienting reality. Wednesday was the kind of day where the numbers felt like spring. 221 million dollars flowed into Bitcoin ETFs. You could almost hear portfolio managers sighing with ease. BlackRock’s IBIT led the way, boasting +65.25 million, like a signal that the great return of institutional flows had begun. A few anecdotal withdrawals cast a shadow on the ledger, but nothing sufficient to steal the spotlight from this breath of fresh air. One started to dream. The dream lasted only twenty-four hours. On Thursday, the numbers changed their attire. And not to a suit of light: nearly 100 million $ evaporated from the Bitcoin ETFs. Grayscale (GBTC) lost 60.2 million, Bitwise (BITB) 44.19 million, Fidelity (FBTC) 23.27 million, ARKB 20.05 million… Even the most discreet, like VanEck (HODL) and Wisdomtree (BTCW), had to bow. Volumes remained high (2.58 billion $), but net assets melted down to 92.18 billion $. The winter had not said its final word. Friday was more discreet, but no less worrying. One of those days when you open the curtains and nothing happens. Zero influx. No new dollar in the 12 funds scrutinized. And yet, 65 million have left . Again GBTC, ARKB, and BITB in the crosshairs, like pillars that are slowly being eroded. And while interest faded, volumes jumped to 4.43 billion $, as if everything was happening behind the scenes. Silence on the surface, agitation in the aisles. What we retain is not just the flight of capitals. It’s the rhythm, the repetition, the choreography. Wednesday the inflow, Thursday the outflow, Friday the absence. All against a backdrop of increasing volumes, as if the big operators were not fleeing… but simply changing rooms. Behind these 165 million dollars vanished in three days, some see a voluntary pause, a form of strategic observation. A way for institutions to hold their breath before the major macro turns to come. And while Bitcoin ETFs lost altitude, those linked to ether timidly recolored their curve. The fund EZET from Franklin Templeton recorded an inflow of 2.06 million dollars, breaking a series of daily withdrawals. Its trading volume jumped to 371.79 million $, and net assets slightly recovered to 6.16 billion $. An ounce of regained confidence in the Ethereum ecosystem, like a sign that not everything is turning red. The tweet from @ali_charts punctuates this sequence with 700 BTC sold via ETF in a week. That’s a lot. And it’s not much. Because in terms of markets, everything is a matter of context… and tempo. Bitcoin ETFs have not sunk, but they have wobbled. And this fragility, right in the heart of a cycle where they are supposed to open the doors of the crypto market to the general public , is thought-provoking. These products have become the bridge between the plush world of Wall Street and the wild lands of blockchain. They are supposed to reassure, streamline, and democratize. So when capital flows out, one wonders: is the bridge wobbling… or is it simply retreating to bounce back better?

Investors slammed the brakes on bitcoin ETF exposure on Friday, April 4, marking yet another tough session for the asset class. With zero inflows recorded across all 12 funds, outflows stacked up to $64.88 million, driven primarily by Grayscale’s GBTC ($25.21 million), Ark 21shares’ ARKB ($21.82 million), and Bitwise’s BITB ($17.85 million). It was a day of sharp contrasts. While capital exited the sector, total trading activity surged, with bitcoin ETFs registering a strong $4.43 billion in volume, nearly double Thursday’s figure. Still, this heightened action couldn’t lift sentiment, as total net assets settled at $94.45 billion, down from recent highs. Meanwhile, ether ETFs quietly staged a minor comeback. Franklin Templeton’s EZET stepped in with a $2.06 million inflow, the only positive movement of the day. Though modest, the green print broke ether ETFs’ weeklong outflow streak. The rest of the funds remained flat, with no capital movement reported. Ether ETF trading volume climbed to $371.79 million, and net assets nudged up slightly to $6.16 billion. The contrast between bitcoin’s broad-based exits and ether’s fragile inflow raises questions as investors look for clues in next week’s macro events. Was Friday a temporary breather or a sign of deeper sentiment shifts ahead? 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Despite Mantle announcing major ecosystem updates, the MNT token remains in a bearish trend—though it has established a new, major support level managed to hold it for the past few weeks. On March 2, Mantle ( MNT ) released a letter to MNT token holders, outlining the project’s plans for Q2 of this year. The key highlights include upcoming launch of Mantle Banking, a unified fiat-crypto neobank, and Mantle Index Four (MI4), a tokenized, institutional-grade crypto fund. Mantle just released their Q2 letter to token holders, revealing some of their biggest moves yet. From a tokenized index fund with an initial commitment $400M to crypto-native banking, and upcoming strategies — there's a lot to unwrap. Here’s your no-fluff overview 👇 pic.twitter.com/UnhTArywjd Additionally, the letter outlined key achievements as the project moves into Q2. Notably, Mantle has integrated EigenDA on mainnet to enhance data availability, attracted over 27K cmETH in its fixed yield vault, and secured Mantle Network ’s modular architecture with 162.9K mETH. FBTC surpassed $1.2 billion in total value locked and expanded across multiple EVM chains. The project has also made strides toward becoming the largest ZK rollup offering institutional-grade security, with OP-Succinct development now live on testnet. Despite these developments , MNT has been in a clear downtrend since Feb. 3, when the price started to consistently make lower lows and lower highs. Around that time, the price also started trading below both the 20-day Exponential Moving Average and 50-day Simple Moving Average. However, it broke above the 20-day EMA for about two weeks in March, while still trading below 50-day SMA. On March 30, MNT dropped back below the 20-day EMA ($0.79) where it continues to hover, currently trading at $0.74. The Relative Strength Index is at 38.60, trending downward but not yet in oversold territory, meaning there’s room for more downside. The MACD indicator remains bearish, with both the MACD line and the signal line below zero. Overall, the bearish pressure dominates for now. On the bright side, the price has been holding a major horizontal support zone at around $0.72 since mid-March. The first major resistance is at $0.80, aligning with the 20-day EMA. A stronger resistance level is at $1.00, where the price consolidated in February before resuming the downtrend. A move above $0.80 would be the first sign of potential recovery, but for a chance of trend reversal, MNT would need to break above $1.00 with strong volume and hold.

JUST IN 🚨: Argentina reportedly in final negotiations with the United States to become the first zero-tariff country

chart time frame : 1D. Observations and Analysis: Price Trend: The price chart shows a significant downtrend, with the price currently at $0.5603. The price has been consistently declining, indicating strong bearish momentum. BOLL (Bollinger Bands): The price is currently near the lower Bollinger Band, suggesting a potential oversold condition. However, in strong downtrends, prices can remain near the lower band for extended periods. SAR (Parabolic SAR): The SAR dots are above the price candles, confirming the downtrend. SAR suggests the downtrend is likely to continue as long as the dots remain above the price. Volume (VOL): The volume bars are not particularly high, indicating a lack of strong buying interest. This reinforces the bearish sentiment. Moving Averages (MA): The 5-day and 10-day moving averages are both sloping downwards, confirming the downtrend. The shorter MA is below the longer MA, indicating bearish momentum. MACD: The MACD line is below the signal line, and both are below zero, indicating a bearish trend. The histogram is also negative, further supporting the bearish sentiment. KDJ (Stochastic Oscillator): The KDJ lines are below 20, suggesting an oversold condition. However, as with the Bollinger Bands, oversold conditions can persist in strong downtrends. RSI (Relative Strength Index): The RSI is at 27.11, indicating an oversold condition. However, similar to the KDJ, oversold conditions can persist during strong downtrends. Stoch RSI (Stochastic Relative Strength Index): The Stoch RSI is also at the bottom, indicating an oversold condition. Price Projection: Based on the analysis, the current trend is strongly bearish. While the indicators suggest oversold conditions, they do not necessarily indicate an immediate reversal. The price could continue to decline in the short term. Potential Scenarios: Continued Downtrend: If the bearish momentum persists, the price could continue to decline, potentially testing lower support levels. Consolidation: The price might consolidate within a range if the selling pressure eases. Potential Reversal: A reversal is possible if there is a significant increase in buying volume and the indicators start to show bullish divergences. However, there is no clear indication of a reversal at this time. disclaimer : don't agree with me do your investment at your own research and risk.