Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesCopyBotsEarn
DAO Members Liable Under Partnership Law: California Ruling

DAO Members Liable Under Partnership Law: California Ruling

CryptoNewsCryptoNews2024/11/19 12:55
By:Hassan Shittu

A California court ruling classifies DAOs as general partnerships under state law, exposing members to potential liability for actions taken within the organization.

Last updated:
November 19, 2024 05:09 EST

In a groundbreaking decision, a California court has ruled that decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) can be treated as general partnership under state law, exposing their members to potential liability for the actions of other participants.

The ruling , issued by U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria on November 18, focuses on Lido DAO, the governing body behind the liquid staking protocol, and its members.

This decision represents a significant precedent in regulating DAOs, bringing a bigger risk to decentralized governance structures.

DAO Governance Restructuring: Are Members Now Liable Under Partnership Law?

The case arose when Andrew Samuels, an investor in Lido DAO’s native tokens (LDO), filed a lawsuit alleging that the tokens were unregistered securities.

DAO Members Liable Under Partnership Law: California Ruling image 1 Source: Samuels v. Lido DAO / courtlistener.com

Samuels claimed that Lido DAO should have registered the tokens with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and held the DAO liable for his losses.

Judge Chhabria’s ruling confirmed that Lido DAO qualifies as a general partnership under California law, meaning its members could be held responsible for the organization’s actions.

The court identified several large institutional participants, including Paradigm Operations, Andreessen Horowitz, and Dragonfly Digital Management, as general partners due to their alleged involvement in Lido DAO’s governance and operations.

While these entities face potential liability, Robot Ventures, another alleged partner, was dismissed from the case due to insufficient evidence of its participation in DAO activities.

The court emphasized that Lido DAO’s decentralized structure does not exempt it from legal responsibility.

Judge Chhabria noted that individuals or entities engaging in governance or operational activities within a DAO could be considered partners under state laws, regardless of the DAO’s self-proclaimed decentralized nature.

Implications for Decentralized Governance

The ruling has far-reaching implications for DAOs, many of which rely on token-based governance systems.

Miles Jennings, the General Counsel at Andreessen Horowitz’s crypto division, described the decision as a “huge blow to decentralized governance.”

Today, a California judge dealt a huge blow to decentralized governance.

Under the ruling, any DAO participation (even posting in a forum) could be sufficient to hold DAO members liable for the actions of other members under general partnership laws.

It's time to DUNA. pic.twitter.com/aKNBY7pfc9

— miles jennings (@milesjennings) November 19, 2024

Jennings warned that even minimal involvement in a DAO, such as posting in a governance forum, could be interpreted as evidence of partnership and lead to liability.

The decision is part of the growing scrutiny DAOs face as they expand into financial markets.

With this new rule, treating DAOs as general partnerships, courts may hold members accountable for organizational actions, challenging the notion that decentralization inherently limits liability.

The court’s interpretation extends liability to governance structures where token holders make decisions and share profits, a common model among DAOs.

It also dismisses arguments that the lack of direct token sales shields DAOs from securities laws, broadening the definition of “offer or sale” to include solicitation through exchanges.

As many argued under Jennings’ post, this ruling could signal a shift in how DAOs operate, encouraging participants to adopt formal legal structures to mitigate liability.

Similarly, the SEC recently filed charges against Mango DAO and Blockworks Foundation for the unregistered sale of $70 million of MNGO tokens, labeling them as crypto asset securities.

Mango DAO agreed to a $700,000 penalty, destroyed its MNGO tokens, and requested that exchanges halt MNGO trading.

The SEC also charged Mango Labs LLC, a developer for Mango DAO, for unregistered broker activity.

The SEC emphasized in the report that DAO status does not exempt entities from securities registration requirements.

With Mango DAO already facing a penalty for a similar lawsuit, the likelihood of Lido DAO not winning the current standing lawsuit against them is high.

Trending News Price Predictions Recommended Articles
Altcoin News Ripple Labs CEO Faces Backlash for Shilling XRP and CBDCs in Alleged Trump Meeting 2024-11-17 18:00:00 , by Ruholamin Haqshanas
Price Analysis Is Stellar the Next Ripple? Bullish Action as XLM Spikes 32% in A Day 2024-11-17 09:04:58 , by Arslan Butt
Altcoin News ‘Earn & Burn’ Could Push FET and ASI Alliance to New Highs 2024-11-16 17:00:00 , by Ruholamin Haqshanas
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Locked for new tokens.
APR up to 10%. Always on, always get airdrop.
Lock now!

You may also like

MicroStrategy Buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, Raising BTC Holdings at 439K

The company's BTC holdings are now worth over $46.7 billion at current prices

CyrptoRo2024/12/18 01:00

Bitcoin Hit a New ATH Above $107K, as BTC ETFs Recorded 13 Consecutive Inflow Days

Since November 27, BTC ETFs recorded almost $6 billion in inflows, amidst rising institutional interest

CyrptoRo2024/12/18 01:00

AAVE drops below $360

Cointime2024/12/18 00:55