UK’s ‘Help with Fees’ scheme won’t define crypto as disposable income
British citizens who hope to access legal assistance through the proposed “Help with Fees” (HwF) scheme will not have cryptocurrency holdings classified as disposable income.
The United Kingdom’s Ministry of Justice published its response following public consultation over its proposed legal aid scheme to provide equal access to the justice system. HwF aims to provide financial support for court or tribunal fees to individuals with low income and minimal savings.
The scheme intends to ensure that individuals are not prevented from accessing courts and tribunals due to an inability to afford the fees associated. Its primary objectives look to ensure access to justice for low-income individuals, provide money to taxpayers who ultimately bear the cost of fee remissions, and ensure the scheme is accessible and eligibility criteria are clear.
Related: UK Law Commission recommends ‘distinct’ legal category for crypto
The public consultation process drew questions relating to the Ministry of Justice’s proposal to amend the definition of disposable capital to include savings and investments with a “non-exhaustive list” of examples that included cryptocurrencies.
According to the ministry, most respondents support the proposal, highlighting that it helps capture investments that are not available as liquid assets.
Meanwhile, other respondents who disagreed with the proposal commented that applicants should not be penalized for having savings and investments, especially pensioners and self-employed individuals:
“There was also a comment that the non-exhaustive list is too vague and there should be more clarity, for example, that cryptocurrency should be included.”
The government’s response stressed that it would not propose an exhaustive list of the types of capital that would constitute savings and investments, as it would create “unnecessary risk” for all types of capital omitted or not yet developed.
“Furthermore, we confirm that cryptocurrencies are already covered by the current definition of capital under the Fees Orders, and they will continue to be covered by the proposed definition.”
The ministry plans to review its list in the public guidance accompanying HwF applications to assist applicants in figuring out whether certain types of capital are covered in its current definition.
The public response also notes that individuals who have savings or investments above a threshold of £16,000 will be expected to use these resources to pay legal fees before receiving assistance from the HwF scheme.
The U.K. has been inching closer to passing legislation that will bring cryptocurrencies under similar laws that govern traditional assets in the country. The Financial Services and markets Bill is expected to give the U.K. Treasury, the Financial Conduct Authority, the Bank of England and the Payments Systems Regulator the ability to propose and enforce rules for cryptocurrency-related businesses.
Magazine: The Truth Behind Cuba’s Bitcoin Revolution: An on-the-ground report
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Ex-Goldman Sachs Exec Shares Positive Outlook on XRP Amid Legal Challenges
Cardano Hits $1 for the First Time in Two Years, Signaling Strong Market Momentum
XRP Soars as Ripple CEO Applauds Trump’s Treasury Secretary Nominee
Trump and Wall Street: How long will the love affair last?
Share link:In this post: Wall Street loved Trump’s win at first—stocks jumped, Bitcoin soared, and borrowing costs hit rock bottom, but some sectors started cracking fast. Tax cuts and deregulation made financial and energy stocks shoot up, but tariffs and plans to deport workers freaked out economists and markets. Tariffs mean higher prices for Americans, and even Walmart’s warning it’ll have to raise prices if Trump pushes through with his trade war.