Precio de OneFinityONE

Ethereum ($ETH ) is one of the biggest gainers today, rocketing by more than 7%. On the hourly chart, the price of ETH has made a false breakout of the resistance of $2,033. However, if the daily bar closes around that mark or above and with no long wick, the upward is likely to continue to the $2,100 area tomorrow. On the bigger time frame, the rate of the main altcoin has broken the resistance of $1,963.    In this case, one should focus on the current bar's closure in terms of its peak. If it happens above the vital $2,000 zone, growth may continue to $2,100. From the midterm point of view, none of the sides is dominating as the rate is far from the key levels. In this regard, sideways trading in the area of $2,000-$2,200 is the most likely scenario. Ethereum is trading at $2,029 at press time.

The Australian Federal Police (AFP) are currently investigating a widespread cryptocurrency scam in which fraudsters are impersonating representatives of the Binance exchange. The scam has already ensnared over 130 Australians, with victims receiving fake SMS messages that cleverly appear within existing conversation threads, lending them an air of legitimacy. The scammers are utilizing SMS and encrypted messaging platforms to convincingly impersonate Binance staff. These fraudulent messages typically claim that the recipient’s cryptocurrency accounts have been compromised, creating a sense of urgency and instructing them to secure their funds immediately. Related: Australian Police Crack Seed Phrase, Seize $9.5M in Crypto Victims are then directed to transfer their cryptocurrency to a “trusted” wallet – one, of course, that is actually controlled by the scammers. Once the funds are transferred, the scammers rapidly move them through a complex network of wallets, effectively making it impossible for authorities to track and recover the stolen assets The National Anti-Scam Centre (NASC), working in conjunction with the AFP-led Joint Policing Cybercrime Coordination Centre (JPC3), has successfully identified and contacted more than 130 individuals across Australia who were targeted by this sophisticated scam. Authorities are strongly emphasizing the importance of taking immediate action for anyone who has received these fraudulent communications. Victims are urged to report the incident to their bank or digital currency exchange without delay and to also file a report with the police through ReportCyber, using the specific reference number AFP-068. Related: Binance Helps Delhi Police Bust Crypto Scam in India According to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) Deputy Chair Catriona Lowe, impersonation scams are a growing threat. Scammers are increasingly exploiting people’s trust by meticulously copying the identities of reputable organizations like Binance. Lowe stresses the critical importance of verifying communications, even if they appear entirely legitimate. Australians are strongly encouraged to contact organizations directly using official contact details found on their websites, rather than relying on any information provided in suspicious messages. Binance’s Chief Security Officer, Jimmy Su, has expressed serious concern over these ongoing scams, reiterating that the safety and security of their users remains their top priority. Su explained that scammers frequently exploit loopholes in telecom systems to manipulate sender information and create a false sense of urgency in their targets. He urged all Binance users to utilize Binance Verify, a dedicated tool specifically designed to confirm the authenticity of communications originating from the platform. Additionally, Su strongly advised against sharing any sensitive information, such as seed phrases, or making any transfers under pressure or duress. If you believe you have been targeted by a Binance impersonation scam, it is crucial to act quickly. Report the incident to your bank or digital currency exchange and file a report with the police through ReportCyber, using the reference number AFP-068. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

In its latest Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, the U.S. Federal Reserve announced yesterday that it will keep interest rates unchanged at 4.25%-4.5%. Every Fed decision impacts financial markets, and Bitcoin is no exception. Over the past 24 hours, BTC has climbed 3.1%, reflecting investor optimism. But how has Bitcoin reacted to past rate changes? And what might happen next? Let’s take a closer look. The Fed’s Tightening Cycle In April 2022, the federal funds rate was just 0.5%. However, inflation surged to 8.6% by May and peaked at 9.1% in June—the highest level in over a decade. To fight rising prices, the Fed began increasing interest rates. Between May 2022 and July 2023, rates steadily climbed, reaching 5.5% by mid-2023. The rate then remained unchanged until August 2024, as inflation gradually cooled. By August 2024, inflation had dropped to 2.5%, prompting the Fed to shift its stance. In September, it cut rates from 5.5% to 5%. Another reduction in November brought it to 4.75%, followed by a final cut in December to 4.5%. These cuts fueled Bitcoin’s rally. After the September rate drop, BTC surged 10% in just ten days, marking the start of a strong bull run. Bitcoin’s Response to Recent FOMC Meetings March 2024: The Fed kept rates at 5.5%. Bitcoin initially surged to a new all-time high (ATH) before stabilizing between $71K and $61K in April. May 2024: No rate change. $BTC showed minor signs of recovery. June 2024: Despite acknowledging lower inflation, the Fed kept rates steady. BTC fell to $58,360.67. July 2024: No change again. BTC plummeted, hitting a low of $48,919.60 in early August. September 2024: The Fed cut rates to 5%. Bitcoin soared 10%, kicking off a bull run. November 2024: Another 25 bps cut, combined with Donald Trump’s election victory, fueled BTC’s rapid growth. December 2024: The final rate cut (to 4.5%) pushed BTC to a new ATH of $108K. 2025: The Fed Pauses – Will Bitcoin Hold Its Gains? At the January 2025 FOMC meeting, the Fed chose to keep rates at 4.5%, shifting to a “wait and see” approach. By then, Bitcoin had lost some bullish momentum but had still reached an ATH of $109K. The Fed may be on pause, but Bitcoin never really stops. Whether it’s another surge or a cooldown, one thing’s certain – volatility is part of the ride. $LTC $PI

The blockchain landscape is evolving at a very rapid rate, and different networks find it difficult to offer the best combination of decentralization, security, and scalability. Two of the most fascinating projects in this space are Solana (SOL) and Polkadot (DOT). Both projects are keen on developing blockchain technology but take very different approaches to scalability and interconnectivity. It is important that users, developers, and investors who want to choose the appropriate ecosystem to suit their needs understand the difference between Solana and Polkadot. Solana: High-Speed and Low-Fees Transactions Solana was one of the quickest networks on the blockchain with emphasis placed on high throughput at low transaction fees. Its speed is attributed to its revolutionary Proof-of-History (PoH) consensus algorithm that has the ability to handle thousands of transactions per second. Key Solana Features High Throughput: Solana has 65,000 TPS capacity, one of the most scalable networks. Low Fees: Transaction fees on Solana are extremely low compared to Ethereum and most other networks. Growing Ecosystem: Solana is building its DeFi, NFT, and Web3 ecosystem with developers and users migrating to it. Single-Layer Architecture: Unlike Polkadot’s multi-chain strategy, Solana is a single-layer blockchain, which reduces complexity. The rapidity and inexpensiveness of Solana have turned it into the default choice for DeFi platforms, gaming apps, and NFT stores. Low-cost and fast transactions are what users looking for SOL swap services like about other chains. Polkadot: Cross-Chain Communication and Interoperability. Polkadot takes a different approach with its focus on multi-chain architecture and interoperability. It has no single-layer blockchain but employs a relay chain to connect multiple blockchains (parachains) in order to share security and be able to communicate with one another easily. Major Features of Polkadot Scalability Using Parachains: Polkadot’s parachain capability allows various blockchains to coexist in parallel with each other, which maximizes efficiency. Cross-Chain Compatibility: Polkadot, unlike Solana, can be utilized as a bridge between different blockchains so that easy transfers can be done of assets and data shared. Shared Security: Parachains are secured by the Relay Chain of Polkadot, which makes it easier for new projects to be launched securely. Governance and Upgradability: Polkadot has decentralized governance, and token holders can vote on protocol upgrades without having to use hard forks. Polkadot is optimal for projects requiring cross-chain capability and therefore is a favorite of applications that require interaction with multiple blockchains. Solana vs. Polkadot: Main Differences Solana and Polkadot do their blockchain designs in very different manners. Solana employs Proof-of-History (PoH) alongside Proof-of-Stake (PoS), allowing it to process up to 65,000 transactions per second (TPS). This makes it one of the world’s fastest blockchains. Polkadot, on the other hand, uses Nominated Proof-of-Stake (NPoS) and is scaled using parachains, where several independent blockchains are executed in parallel. Each parachain has a lower TPS individually, but the overall system is enhanced through shared security as well as cross-chain communication. Yet another significant difference lies in transaction cost. Solana’s very low fees (typically less than $0.01 per transaction) are highly desirable for high-frequency applications in DeFi, games, and NFTs. Polkadot’s fees vary parachain-based, so more expensive for some applications but apt for applications calling for interoperability. Security-wise, Solana is backed by a decentralized set of validators, while Polkadot enhances security by spreading it across parachains using its relay chain. Thus, Polkadot is more attractive to developers who want to build their own chains without necessarily building security from scratch. Where interoperability is concerned, Polkadot takes the cake. It enables various blockchains to communicate and send assets to each other, which is vastly important for projects that need cross-chain functionality. Solana is instead aiming to create a one-layer fast and efficient network, and therefore projects in the Solana ecosystem enjoy its speed but can fall short when it comes to interacting with other blockchains that are not ones within Solana. Finally, the developer ecosystem itself is unique as well. Solana has carved out a distinct DeFi, NFT, and gaming lead with a developer base concentrating on speed and price. Polkadot is less about cross-chain and interoperability applications and is thus an option for blockchain infrastructure and for projects looking to bridge many networks. Solana and Polkadot are both strong players in the blockchain space with contrasting use cases which they fulfill. Solana is all about high TPS and low fee, while Polkadot is all about interoperability and security. The developers and users simply need to decide between the two based on their needs. Because both ecosystems are developing, they both probably have an important contribution to make to the future of blockchain.

$GPT $GPT liquidity owner removed i think one zero more added sorry guys ......